The Everett City Mafia

Contact me: resras8r at frontier.com

Is the prosecutor going to fix this? Case 18-2-00105-31 (listed as LUPA and corrected by the judge to be a Writ.)) Cindy Larsen (not the judge on he case) exparte signed/filed a false order some unsworn Everett attorneys wrote for her, ~saying LUPA stopped the city from meeting permit requirements. That false order was never disclosed to the Plaintiff (me). The Land manager (approvals for kickbacks) allegedly was "removed" by the FBI two years ago. No violations at McD, Jimmy Johns, at 2010 Broadway, or any permit violations turned in my other residents that I've talked to have been fixed or replied to or acted upon by the City. Larsen's signature, not name, is on her false order.(Larsen's illegal and false order said ~LUPA (with its 14-day appeal period from an Examiner's decision on publicly vetted matters) ruled over permit requirements. IN TRUTH, PERMITS aren' t even publicly disclosed until they are approved, and no one sees them before that but the City and applicant. Permits must meet detailed state & local laws, laws which remain in effect for the life of the property's use (expo facto). LUPA was the lie the City has told itself for decades on why they could cheat. (I did a comedy skit about it - see bcornie.com) I have proof the City alters their laws repeatedly after I catch them violating them. But the laws that apply are those at the time of the application: expo facto. From pions to County court judges, no check and balance checks anything. Everett has its conspiring council, planning commission, examiners, mayor, and county judges --. Everett is set up so they can effortlessly cheat with impunity. The press avoids negative stories about Everett because the City is the news source they depend on. Attorneys won't take on Everett because they either work for the City or know that Everett has a 100% win ratio in Snohomish County court, across the street from Everett headquarters. Yes, Everett, WA functions like the mafia. They don't reply to complaints about permit violations. They prevent citizens from complaining before the council beyond one 3-minute shot. They have foreclosed on every possible avenue to be heard or get justice. The County Court depends on the City to tell them what the law says so they don't have to look it up. Three judges took the City at its word in my case alone with zero evidence. Judge Okoloko went further and denial after denial concealed the crimes of the Court and the City. Judge Cindy Larsen's fake order set PRECEDENT for 2 cases so far. Everett only had to get her false order FILED to nullify all laws. I first saw Larsen's false order in the 2nd case with Jimmy John's. The City again presented no defense, instead told 30 new lies. That judge Okoloko gave me 2 days to reply, after which the City attorney lied further in court (case 19-2-01827-31). I submitted a Motion to set aside, where on P. 26 Exhibit I, I presented the ACTUAL law that proved that Larsen's order was a lie: The following is a quote: EMC 15.16.040...administrative review is code compliance verification.Review Process I applications shall be reviewed administratively by the planning department to determine compliance with the city's zoning code and other applicable ordinances and regulations...., and EMC 19.35.030A New Development “shall provide landscaping in accordance with the requirements of this chapter EMC 16.005.040(A)(11) (4) The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans and/or specifications shall not be deemed or construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violations of any of the provisions of this Codeor any other law or regulation. No permit presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of this Code shall be valid, except insofar as the work or use, which it authorized, is lawful. 5. The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans and/or specifications shall not prevent the Building Official or his or her designeefrom thereafter requiringthe correction of errors in said plans and/or specifications or from preventing construction operation being carried on thereunder when in violation of this Code or of any other ordinance, law or regulations or from revoking any certification of approval when issued in error. EMC 16.005.050(12) 1. A violation of the provisions of this Code shall be subject to the City’s Civil Enforcement Procedures as set forth in Chapter 1.20 EMC and any person, firm or corporation who violates any provision of this Code shall be subject to said enforcement procedures. 16.005.050 (12) . (12) 1. Any violation of this Code determined to exist after inspection by the Building Official, or his or her designee, is hereby declared to be a nuisance. 16.005.050 (11) 2. Any person, firm or corporation who violates any provision of this Code shall be deemed guiltyof a misdemeanor, and each such person , firm, or corporation shall be deeemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Code is committed, continued, or permitted. Yes, all from the mayor, the city attorneys, the judges, and the planning department, all are criminally and financially liable. EMC14.40 stated the fine is a minimum of $250 per day per violation. That means, every one above is liable for ~$52 million, just for permitting and continuing the violations at McDonald's. That's why the City keeps rewriting their laws: to cover up their crimes. (It's not the crimes, it's the bad faith and malace of the cover-up.) Who but the prosecuting attorney is going to fix this? You can contact me at jeanrittmann at frontier.com Deails, including 30 violations at McD (though there are 40) are at everettcheats.com